首页> 外文OA文献 >You Scratch Someone’s Back and We’ll Scratch Yours: Collective Reciprocity in Social Q&A Communities
【2h】

You Scratch Someone’s Back and We’ll Scratch Yours: Collective Reciprocity in Social Q&A Communities

机译:您抓了别人的背,我们也会抓您的:社会问答社区中的集体互惠

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Taking a structuration perspective while integrating reciprocity research in economics, this study examines the dynamics of reciprocal interactions in social Q&A communities. We postulate that individual users of social Q&A constantly adjust their kindness into the direction of the observed benefit and effort of others. Collective reciprocity emerges from this pattern of conditional strategy of reciprocation and helps form a structure that guides the very interactions that give birth to the structure. Based on a large sample of data from Yahoo! Answers, our empirical analysis supports the collective reciprocity premise, showing that the more effort (relative to benefit) an asker contributes to the community, the more likely the community will return the favor. On the other hand, the more benefit (relative to effort) the asker takes from the community, the less likely the community will cooperate in terms of providing answers. We conclude that a structuration view of reciprocity sheds light on the duality of social norms in online communities.
机译:本研究从结构性观点出发,将对等研究与经济学相结合,研究了社会问答社区中对等互动的动态。我们假设社交问答的单个用户不断将他们的好意调整为观察到的他人利益和努力的方向。集体互惠从这种条件式互惠战略模式中出现,并有助于形成一种结构,该结构指导着产生这种结构的相互作用。基于Yahoo!的大量数据样本答案是,我们的经验分析支持了集体互惠的前提,表明,提问者为社区做出的努力(相对于利益)越多,社区就越有可能获得青睐。另一方面,询问者从社区中获得的利益(相对于努力)越多,社区在提供答案方面进行合作的可能性就越小。我们得出的结论是,互惠的结构化观点揭示了在线社区中社会规范的二重性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wu, PF; Korfiatis, N;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号